Can anyone explain the math involved in child support payments? How is it that a father can be told by the state to pay $225 a month for two kids when the mother makes less than he does and has the children 5 nights/week, and also pays for 90% of their food, 75% of their clothing, all of their incidentals (e.g., toothpaste, birthday gifts, violin rental, laundry detergent) and does 95% of the work involved in keeping them going, e.g., appearing civilized and moderately groomed, getting their homework done, arriving in the right place at somewhat the right time. It seems to me that the courts ASSUME that somehow the mother will come up with the rest of the money that the $225 does not cover in monthly expenses — whether it means borrowing or working crap jobs that take her away from her kids or renting out more and more of her house. How this adds up to make any kind of sense whatsoever is beyond me.
Email Subscriptions
"And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom.” Anais Nin
“I see my path, but I don’t know where it leads. Not knowing where I’m going is what inspires me to travel it.” -Rosalia de Castro
“It isn’t what happens to us that causes us to suffer; it’s what we say to ourselves about what happens.” ~Pema Chodron
Sit. Feast on your life. - Derek Walcott
Recent Posts
Categories
Tags
1992
anger
Blog Action Day
books
breasts
child custody
childhood depression
children and divorce
child support
cleaning
Clinton
community
dating
debt
divorce
election
faith
financial angst
financial relationships
friendship
Greg Brown
Halloween
home
hope
house
Julia Childs
Lionel Ritchie
lost love
love
mammogram
marriage
melancholy
money
new year
Obama
Palin
Pippi Longstocking
poverty
questions
Rufus Wainwright
Seattle
separation
yoga
youth
zen

4 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 28, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Lara
That is TERRIBLE! I get twice that for one child in Illinois! I’m not sure of the calculations that add into that…I’m pretty sure the courts don’t consider maintenance and upkeep of the children – in a quantifiable manner over the $225 anyway. Did you go online and do the calculator? That is how I agreed w/my ex on the amount. $225 just doesn’t seem right at all!
October 28, 2009 at 8:43 pm
shell
Unfortunately, its probably right. But, I would check on it either way (and you can always request more than the calculations). I got twice that from an ex with part time work basically, so the numbers do seem mighty low. That said, the system is surely not set up for accountability. And, the CBPP – center for budget and public policy have done research showing that the figures are severely dated and thus hurting women disproportionately…all this is to say, it sucks big time.
October 29, 2009 at 12:08 am
Elizabeth Van Jacob
You need a better lawyer!
October 29, 2009 at 12:53 am
Michele
Yes, something does indeed seem pretty screwy there. Here in Michigan there’s a calculator and you can download it yourself and run the numbers. Is he covering health insurance, out of pocket medical, or day care expenses or anything like that? That would factor in as well. Certainly sounds to me like it would be worth a call to the court or a lawyer.
I pay the child support even though we have 50-50 custody because I make more money. It burns my ass to see that money come out of my paycheck every month, but it could have been worse. I was able to get his wages imputed to a higher amount so the child support calculation was based on an assigned wage for him and it doesn’t matter what he actually makes. It’s his choice to work very little. He makes damn good money when he works, but he finds it very stressful. My point is when you have kids you have to be a grown up and sometimes do things you find stressful.